Infant Brain Bleeding and Birth Injuries
In 2008, eleven-year-old Cassidy Ediger sued Dr. William Johnston, obstetrician and gynecologist for damages that were caused by injuries during her birth at Chilliwack General Hospital in British Columbia. Young Cassidy suffers permanent brain damage resulting from deprivation of oxygen in the lead up to her birth when Dr. Johnston unsuccessfully attempted to use a rotational forceps procedure to assist the delivery. This failed attempt caused Cassidy’s heart action to slow down until she was delivered by cesarean section and resuscitated eighteen minutes later.
Ms. Ediger, through her mother, alleged that Dr. Johnston was negligent in attempting the procedure in the first place. Further, she claimed that Dr. Johnston had attempted the procedure without having adequately ensured a back-up surgical team in the event surgery was needed, as it eventually did. Additionally, Ms. Ediger claimed that, even though she was only a fetus, Dr. Johnston had not informed her by way of her mother about the risks of the procedure or the alternatives to the procedure. Dr. Johnston denied that he had been negligent in attempting the procedure, he also contested that he had owed Ms. Cassidy the duty to inform her of the procedure, its risks or alternatives as she was just a fetus.
In cases of birth trauma that cause brain injury the court must determine 4 issues:
- Standard of Care: What is the standard of care expected of the medical professionals involved in labor and delivery?
- Breach of Standard: Did the medical practitioner’s breach (fail to meet) the standard of care owed to the patient during laboutr5 and delivery?
- Causation: If the medical practitioner breached the standard of care, did the breach of the standard of care cause all or a part of the child’s brain injury and consequent deficits? and
- Damages: If so, what are the harms and losses that flow from the breach, like non-pecuniary damages, future wage loss, cost of future care, special damages?
Standard of Care
In medicine, the standard of care is the level of care expected to be provided by a competent medical professional. A health professional should act at a level at which an ordinary, prudent Canadian medical professional with the same level of knowledge, competence and experience would act under the same or similar circumstances.
Once a court has established or concluded that a medical practitioner had failed to meet the appropriate standard of care, the court will question whether the failure was the cause of the brain injury suffered by the child. Generally, the court will use the “but for” test.
“But for” Test
The “but for” test seeks to determine that but for the failure, would the injury have occurred? Where the “but for” test is impractical, causation may be determined where the medical practitioner’s negligence “materially contributed” to the occurrence of the brain injury.
Damages for Birth Trauma and Birth Injuries
- Damages for non-pecuniary loss (what most people refer to as compensation for “pain and suffering”)
- Special Damages (out of pocket expenses)
- Costs of future care
- Accommodation and renovations
- In-trust claims for past and future services by parents or guardians
- Loss of future earning capacity for the injured child
Did the Physician Breach the Standard of Care?
In the case of Ediger v. Johnston above, the court determined that risks must be foreseeable. But doctors are not required to foresee a specific risk. Rather, it is enough for the court to fix liability if one can foresee the risk of an injury in a general way. Therefore, the physician caring for Cassidy and her mother didn’t need to foresee precisely that the procedure taken by Dr. Johnston would cause the heart to slow. It was enough that the risk of the procedure, in general, might cause serious harm to a fetus.
Additionally, after Dr. Johnston had decided to abandon the procedure and call for a cesarean section, the court found that the anesthetist on duty was unavailable as he was attending to an urgent “life or death” situation within the hospital. There was no other anesthetist on-call within 20-30 minutes of the hospital, which further increased the risk of permanent brain damage. While guidelines set in the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (the SOGC) do give hospitals the discretion to adapt protocols of having a back-up surgical team on standby based on each hospital’s particular circumstances, Dr. Johnston should have taken steps to ensure that his anesthetist was available before carrying out the procedure.
Did the Negligence Cause the Birth Injury?
Based on medical evidence, prolonged deprivation of oxygen due to the slowing of a heart or other complications such as obstruction of an umbilical cord can cause hypoxia that in turn may cause permanent brain damage. The court had to determine whether the actions of the doctor caused the hypoxia, or whether the brain damage was caused by a complication independent of the procedure carried out by the physician. In Cassidy’s case, the “but for” standard proved that Dr. Johnston’s negligence caused the harm sustained.
Did Dr. Johnston Proceed Without Mrs. Ediger’s Informed Consent?
Dr. Johnston argued that he did not mention the risks of the procedure out of kindness to Mr. and Mrs. Ediger who were going through the already traumatic circumstances of childbirth and were exhausted. The court determined that however well-intended and compassionate Dr. Johnston was, modern law required that physicians must disclose risks and alternatives to ensure a patient may make an informed decision. Therefore Dr. Johnston had proceeded with the procedure without Mrs. Ediger’s, and by extension, the fetus’ informed consent.
Damages Awarded for Birth Injuries?
The courts determined that Cassidy be awarded damages totaling $3,224,000. These damages included non-pecuniary loss, special damages, costs of future care, accommodation costs associated with renovations, loss of earning capacity and in-trust services by her parents.
Today Cassidy suffers from cerebral palsy. She lacks motor control and cannot speak or eat normally. She is tube-fed and because of limited mobility, she is confined to a wheelchair. Cassidy is almost always dependant on others for all her daily needs. She will need therapy and the use of equipment to aid her throughout her life. While Cassidy has a devoted and supportive family and community, she is not expected to live beyond the age of 38.
See an Experienced Lawyer
Birth injuries can occur from complications leading to labor. But sometimes the injuries can result from negligence during prenatal medical care. At McKiggan Hebert, we understand the complexities and nuanced nature of birth injuries and their effects on a young family in the long term. If you have a child who suffers from brain damage that you think may have been caused by medical malpractice or negligence, call us on (888) 510-3577 or toll free at (888) 510-3577 or fill out our online contact form.